35mm at 4000dpi vs. Medium Format at 2500dpi

Here is my take on the discussion of the merits of using medium format at 2500 dpi vs. using 35 mm film at 4000 dpi. Figuring that a picture is worth 1000 words, I have created some images to illustrate the issue. This table illustrates what the image simulations were meant to represent.
10526 dpi14 mm negative
6421 dpi22 mm negative
4000 dpi36 mm negative
2421 dpi58 mm negative
1473 dpi94 mm negative
947 dpi152 mm negative
632 dpi247 mm negative

In the above table, the top image represents a scan of an image where the grain size of 10526 grain fields per milimeter matches the scan resolution. The bottom image is scanned at a much lower resolution, so grain is less evident

To create these images, I started with an image 1600 by 1200 in size and painted it with random noise to simulate an extreme case of film grain. The top image, being a scan using a resolution matching the grain size, is very noisy. Each subsequent image was created by resizing the 1600x1200 image by the next integer multiple of the golden ratio. The negative size indicated is calculated from extrapolating from 36mm in either direction using this multiplication factor (golden ratio).

Thus, each image represents a picture taken on the same type of film but on different film formats. All images are identical in size because they represent the same image.