Loreal Vive.. anything wrong?
Posted by Sid on September 04, 2003 at 12:05:48: Previous Next
As for the Loreal Vive smooth intense line, it has been racking up great reviews lately, but I wonder... is there anyone on this board who has used it and it doesn't work well for them? Now is a good time to speak of it. I am excited to try it soon but I don't know, al this hype I'm just not sure it can live up to it....
Re: Loreal Vive.. anything wrong?
Posted by S - on September 04, 2003 at 12:45:04: Previous Next
In Reply to: Loreal Vive.. anything wrong? posted by Sid on September 04, 2003 at 12:05:48:
is there anyone on this board who has used it and it doesn't work well for them?
Well I can only speak from my own experiences with my hair type and;
I wouldn't say it didn't work well for me. Initially the results were great but by the time I had bought my second bottle of shampoo and conditioner I felt the results were not as pleasing as they had been.
I do find it difficult finding a product that gives great results all the time. I enjoy experimenting though, so it’s not such a drag.
I'm currently using Aussie Moist (shampoo and conditioner) and I’m very pleased with the results. I've never used anything that has left my hair as tangle free and that, for me is a big plus. It also styles really well when dry.
However, will I still be using it (Aussie) in a month? Well the jury is still out on that one.
:)
Re: Loreal Vive.. anything wrong?
Posted by In Flames on September 04, 2003 at 13:01:34: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: Loreal Vive.. anything wrong? posted by S - on September 04, 2003 at 12:45:04:
I find the stuff good i find its the best shampoo i can use on my hair
Re: Loreal Vive.. anything wrong?
Posted by Jude on September 04, 2003 at 21:33:02: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: Loreal Vive.. anything wrong? posted by In Flames on September 04, 2003 at 13:01:34:
well, now that i wear a ponytail nearly everyday, i find flyaways are less noticeable, and my hair feels better then it has in awhile. It used to be dry, even using Aussie Moist. Now it just seems healthier, and i like how my hair lays with it. So i mean, yah... the results were fantastic for me, but thats really the thing: It worked for ME. Maybe it will or won't for you though. Its cheap, so experiment with a bunch of brands! Have fun with it.
Re: Loreal Vive.. anything wrong?
Posted by Sid on September 05, 2003 at 11:31:37: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: Loreal Vive.. anything wrong? posted by Jude on September 04, 2003 at 21:33:02:
: So i mean, yah... the results were fantastic for me, but thats really the thing: It worked for ME. Maybe it will or won't for you though.
What is your hair like?
Re: Aussie
Posted by Hair Religion on September 04, 2003 at 23:42:34: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: Loreal Vive.. anything wrong? posted by S - on September 04, 2003 at 12:45:04:
I've been using Aussie Moist for years now and find it just as good now as the first bottle. This stuff DOESN'T build up like lower quality brands.
Re: Question about Aussie
Posted by Aries on September 05, 2003 at 06:22:50: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: Aussie posted by Hair Religion on September 04, 2003 at 23:42:34:
: What about the new formula of Aussie? Same results or not as good?
Re: new stuff
Posted by Hair Religion on September 06, 2003 at 00:39:06: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: Question about Aussie posted by Aries on September 05, 2003 at 06:22:50:
Feels and works the same to me.
Re: Aussie
Posted by Sid on September 05, 2003 at 11:30:36: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: Aussie posted by Hair Religion on September 04, 2003 at 23:42:34:
: I've been using Aussie Moist for years now and find it just as good now as the first bottle. This stuff DOESN'T build up like lower quality brands.
Does Loreal Vive build up your hair at all?
Re: build-up
Posted by Hair Religion on September 06, 2003 at 00:38:07: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: Aussie posted by Sid on September 05, 2003 at 11:30:36:
Someone just said that the second bottle isn't doing as well as the first, that sounds like build-up to me. I haven't looked at the lable for this one but a good place to get current info on products is at salons where they use them all the time and get trade industry info on all kinds of brands.
Re: Loreal Vive.. anything wrong?
Posted by Redleader on September 04, 2003 at 15:10:04: Previous Next
In Reply to: Loreal Vive.. anything wrong? posted by Sid on September 04, 2003 at 12:05:48:
Vive made my hair curlier than normal, thus length appeared shorter. This is what I didn't like about it. Not saying anything bad about curly hair, just I'd rather have waves than ringlets.
Re: Loreal Vive.. anything wrong?
Posted by Sid on September 05, 2003 at 11:33:52: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: Loreal Vive.. anything wrong? posted by Redleader on September 04, 2003 at 15:10:04:
: Vive made my hair curlier than normal, thus length appeared shorter. This is what I didn't like about it. Not saying anything bad about curly hair, just I'd rather have waves than ringlets.
And yet some people say it made their hair straighter? It really must depend on the person's air type then. Do you usually have wavy hair or is it more on the curly side? Mine leans more towards the wavy state, and I don't want it to be curly or straight, I like it wavy.
If you have thin, fine hair...
Posted by LucksKind on September 04, 2003 at 15:29:50: Previous Next
In Reply to: Loreal Vive.. anything wrong? posted by Sid on September 04, 2003 at 12:05:48:
If you have thin, fine hair...it is possible that it may make your hair too flat...
BUT for THICK unruly hair...it may help quite a bit!
The Conditioner is so 'potent' that using it twice (as Justin had tried by mistake)
made my hair way too relaxed and smooth...but this may be great for those
in the awkward stages!
Anyway, what works for one person, may NOT work for another...so experiment.
These ViVE products--at the very LEAST--will be gentle and nourishing to your hair...
and at BEST it will RELAX and SOOTHE & SMOOTH out some of the worst
aspects of any of the awkward stages.
Hope that info helps...
Good Luck!
Re: If you have thin, fine hair...
Posted by Redleader on September 04, 2003 at 15:58:44: Previous Next
In Reply to: If you have thin, fine hair... posted by LucksKind on September 04, 2003 at 15:29:50:
: The Conditioner is so 'potent' that using it twice (as Justin had tried by mistake)
: made my hair way too relaxed and smooth...but this may be great for those
: in the awkward stages!
Could this damage hair in the long run, though, in the same way that deep conditioning too often can lead to negative effects?
Re: If you have thin, fine hair...
Posted by LucksKind on September 04, 2003 at 17:41:28: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: If you have thin, fine hair... posted by Redleader on September 04, 2003 at 15:58:44:
: Could this damage hair in the long run, though, in the same way
that deep conditioning too often can lead to negative effects?"
Hmmmm...maybe 'potent' was a bad choice. How about 'effective'!
I don't think a conditioner would harm your hair. What I meant
was that it could relax thin hair...making it look flat.
Then again, from reading this Board, I would say that most here
have thick hair problems...
Re: Loreal Vive.. anything wrong?
Posted by FITMUS on September 07, 2003 at 21:38:59: Previous Next
In Reply to: Loreal Vive.. anything wrong? posted by Sid on September 04, 2003 at 12:05:48:
After reading the rave about the Loreal Vive, I decided to try it. For my hair, I still think I'm going to stick with Aussie Moist. I actually started using Aussie due to the suggestions on the board a long time ago. Here's my reasons why I'm sticking with Aussie, from most important to least important:
1) Most importantly, I didn't notice any significant difference b/w the shampoos, and I personally like the Aussie Moist conditioner better than Loreal's.
2) I like the smell of Aussie MUCH better than Loreal
3.) Aussie is cheaper than Loreal
Like LuksKind stated previously, it depends on your hair. I would try them both and see which you prefer.