Locks of Love-long post
Posted by Dennis on October 06, 2003 at 05:53:31: Previous Next
With all the hub-bub about Locks of Love, I decided to do a bit of my
own investigating.
Before I share what I have found out, I would like to say that I am
not, in any way, affiliated Locks of Love. I am not suggesting anyone cut their hair and donate it to Locks of Love. I simply want to find out the as much as I can about this charity.
According to the Solicitation of Contributions Act, if you request it, the organization must advise you who to contact to obtain the information. The information must be provided to you within 14 days. Federal law also requires that a copy of the IRS tax return must be made available upon request. I did not personally ask for this information, but assume that any financial figures found online are obtained from these documents.
The first thing that is obvious is that if you are feeling charitable
about your hair and want to feel good about a bald, sick child benefiting from it, don’t donate your hair to Locks of Love. They do, indeed, sell most of the hair that is donated to them. Why...because most of it is unsuitable for wig making. It is either too damaged, too short, or gray. Chances are better if your hair is at least 16 inches in length, very healthy and has no gray in it, it may be used by LOL.
Because they are a small, mostly volunteer organization getting as many as 1000 cut ponytails a week, it is impossible to link a donation with the child. According to the Give.org-Better Business Bureau Wise Giving Alliance, they had a paid staff of 4 and a Board of Directors of 6 in the year 2000. Also, the children who get the hairpieces are minors, and care is given to protect their privacy.
Contrary to what has been reported on this site and others, they do, in fact, make hairpieces for little boys. There is a before and after pic of a boy right on their site. However, they get very few requests for wigs for little boys.
The Give.org page is a little hard to understand if you are not
familiar with the world of charities. Right off the bat, it says that LOL does not meet three of the twenty Council of Better Business Bureau Standards for Charitable Solicitations. The most alarming of the three is that they do not provide an annual report of their financial activites and position. However, in response, they claim the info is in their individual supporting documents.
Using the BBB/CS page to compare LOL to other charities, it appears
that some charities do meet all twenty standards, and some do not meet any. It is also apparent that charities come is all different shapes and sizes. One should use their judgment and weight which of the standards apply and are important to a giver and which are not.
LOL’s financial status is reported lower on the Give.org page. The Florida based company’s income is 2002 was $373,396. Their final assets after expenses are $55,900. Their books certainly should not be $0 after expenses are paid. They spend over half of their income on their program/mission of providing wigs for kids. Their Chief Executive Officer is a paid position and made just over $40,000 in 2000. Comparing these numbers with the dozens of other charities that are listed, there doesn’t seem to be anything unusual. In fact, LOL’s numbers are small potatoes. It may be hard to swallow, but there is profit in charity. Yet, it doesn’t look like anyone is getting rich and a $40,000 salary is perhaps a middle-class living in Palm Springs, FL. The company cannot be entirely corrupt because kids are actually getting wigs.
Financial info from:
http://www.800helpfla.com/gift_givers/g03100114.html
http://www.give.org/reports/care2_dyn.asp?733
The first misconception is that LOL is actually making the wigs when,
in fact, they are not. They provide the hair and the funds to hire a
company to custom make the wigs for the kids.
Children under six years old get synthetic hair in their hairpieces
because their heads grow so fast. It is cheaper to produce a synthetic wig than a human wig. A child may need multiple hairpieces until his head is fully grown.
Proceeds from the sale of hair that is not used goes to other expenses
such as long distance telephone service, postage, shipping printing and other office expenses. Hair is not that valuable of a commodity to
sell. It is bought and sold by the weight and people that buy it are very picky. If LOL cannot use it for a child’s wig, it is practically
useless and they are not going to make much money per pound. Unfortunately, lots of the hair is surely thrown away.
I researched this charity on the web as thoroughly as possible and see
no real complaints about their business practices.
The cost of a hairpiece for a child is $3000 retail. From what I can
tell, LOL gets them for a wholesale price of $1000, but I may be wrong. They encourage people to make financial donations to help pay the salaries of the few that work there. Your financial donations are tax deductible, however donations of hair are not tax deductible because the IRS considers hair a body part.
What I would like to offer to the readers of the board is to not donate your hair to LOL. They have way more hair than they can use. People are going to assume a lot when they hear “sick kids’ and “donate hair”. Locks of Love says all over their site that they sell the hair they cannot use for kids wigs...but do people check it out? I doubt it.
Locks of Love is running off of a lot of publicity. The make-over shows almost always plug them. It would be dangerous to openly say, “hey you guy, we got more hair than we can use, send us money instead”. That would make them like all of the rest of the charities. By being quiet,long haired people send them hair and they sell it for funds to provide the wigs (or other expenses to support the provide). Short haired people see the long haired people and say, “wow...that is sweet. I do not have hair to offer, but I can send some money???”
If anyone can produce anymore cold, hard facts (not hearsay for
assumptions), I would love to hear them. I am not saying that my findings are 100% accurate, but this is what I found. I looked for actual complaints from people who have dealt with the organization and came up with nothing.
What is disturbing and what I think upsets the true long haired folks
is the, “Hey, I would love to see John Longhair get his hair cut
short. Let’s get everyone in the office together and pool our money. He will feel guilty and let us shave his head!”
Yes.that disturbs me, too. But if I was John Longhair I would let
everyone collect their money and then chicken out at the last
minute....flat out refuse to let anyone touch my hair. Tell the office folks that they should send their money to LOL anyway....or they are REAL jerks.
My philosophy of LOL and the make-over shows is if you are weak enough, and have such a low self esteem that you cannot say no to letting a group of your family, friends or co-workers bully you into an unwanted haircut, then you deserve what you get. People do dumb things all the time and learn from their mistakes. DON’T BE BULLIED!! If you want to donate your hair or change your looks drastically go for it. The bullies should have something of equal value taken from them. If a bully does use the LOL guilt trip, tell them the facts and tell them you will match their financial donation to the charity.
If you don’t want people to jump to conclusions about you, do not
jump to conclusions about Locks of Love. You never see anyone representing or employed by Locks of Love actually cutting hair.
Many may disagree, but I think LOL is ultimately a good intentioned organization. It is illegal for a charitble organiation to harass people into making contributions. If I was a child who had no hair and could not afford a wig, I would be delighted to get a LOL wig. However, I would not like to think someone was bullied into supplying the hair for my wig.
Re: research
Posted by Hair Religion on October 06, 2003 at 12:33:08: Previous Next
In Reply to: Locks of Love-long post posted by Dennis on October 06, 2003 at 05:53:31:
Thanks for putting the time into your report. Our real point is that more people should take the time to do this.
You are correct about some boys also getting wigs but they only get the shorter hair because, as L.O.L. puts it, "it is socially acceptable for young men to have short, shaved, or even no hair".
Re: research
Posted by Dennis on October 06, 2003 at 14:16:16: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: research posted by Hair Religion on October 06, 2003 at 12:33:08:
I agree, although I wonder if they would make an exception and make a longer haired wig for a boy if requested. Their web site makes that statement, but does not say they WON'T do a long haired wig for a boy.
: Thanks for putting the time into your report. Our real point is that more people should take the time to do this.
: You are correct about some boys also getting wigs but they only get the shorter hair because, as L.O.L. puts it, "it is socially acceptable for young men to have short, shaved, or even no hair".
Re: Locks of Love
Posted by RD on October 06, 2003 at 14:27:49: Previous Next
In Reply to: Locks of Love-long post posted by Dennis on October 06, 2003 at 05:53:31:
Thanks for your insightful comments, Dennis. I had the same impression when I read the report on their finances--- the three "faults" listed in the report didn't seem like it was a damning indictment of the organization that some people here made it sound like. And I also thought that the LOL website made a full disclosure of the fact that they frequently received hair that they couldn't use, and what they did with it, and why. It seems like you did your homework.
Saying that Locks of Love should stop soliciting hair because they're not making wigs out of 100% of it is sort of like saying, "the Salvation Army should stop soliciting clothing and furniture-- they have more than they could use and they just throw it away or sell it for scrap!". The truth is, the Salvation Army gives away almost none of the clothing and furniture it gathers-- it sells it in their thrift stores, and sells what it can't sell as rags or scrap. I'll bet that they make more money to run the organization from selling it as rags or scrap, than they do selling it in their thrift stores.
Critics of LOL-- do you see the parallel here? Would you fault the Salvation Army for doing what it does with stuff it can't use? Then why is Locks of Love any different from other larger, more well-supported charities, other than it may offend the sensibilities of some people in the longhair community?
Re: locks on the money box
Posted by Hair Religion on October 07, 2003 at 02:50:47: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: Locks of Love posted by RD on October 06, 2003 at 14:27:49:
I'd see the parallel if people were coming up to me saying, "you know, you've had those appliances, furniture and those clothes for a while now, why don't you just give it all to the Salvation Army and go buy all new stuff at your own expense to replace what we want you to get rid of so that this religious organization can make a profit".
Now that is a direct parallel. Still make sense?
The Salvation Army is a fundamentalist religious group (if you didn't already know) who is trying to make a profit to fund their religious activities. I don't agree with what they are trying to do and so I do not donate to them. Some people don't mind what they do but I'll bet that just about anyone who you ask about the Salvation Army doesn't even know that about them. Did you?
There are many things that go into longhairs not liking L.O.L. much but despite the financial stuff the main reason is that they and all the people who respond to their emotional marketing are after our hair. We don't want to give it up and we are sick to death of people trying to get us to give it up.
I don't think that I remember anyone saying that because they weren't making wigs out of 100% of the hair that they should stop. It's that they only use 3% (out of 100%) to make wigs with that bothers most people who learn this.
research your charities!!
Posted by Dennis on October 07, 2003 at 11:10:07: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: locks on the money box posted by Hair Religion on October 07, 2003 at 02:50:47:
I agree with you in part.
The Salvation Army, Goodwill and other thrift-oriented charities do not knock come to your house and suggest you give them your appliances. I think they are more, "if you are giving your appliances away anyway so you can remodel your house and replace them with new ones, why not give them to us?"
Again, research the charity. Most people are just aching to give their junk away and will give it to the operation closest to their house without even realize they might be fueling a charity that goes against everything they stand for (like the Salvation Army!). Even shopping at a thrift store helps their cause.
Needy or desperate people are easy to market, whether it be a person who cannot read, the homeless, a person who is dying of AIDS, a child starving in Africa, or a sick child with no hair. (I do not think they Salvation Army is needy and not sure how they help they needy).
I think it boils down to two thing: the naivity of people with short hair who do not value hair the same way a long haired person does. "Most of the world is short haired....why can't you be short haired like us and help some kids who have NO hair." This isn't fair and doesn't fit into the LOL scheme any better since THEY can donate money easier than you can donate you hair. LOL needs money more than hair.
The other thing is people are don't like people who are different and use LOL as an excuse to harrass them into a short haircut to conform. These people can care less about LOL or sick, bald kids. They can certainly be good actors and get all weepy when trying to get THEIR message across in the guise of helping the sick bald child.
I have nothing against LOL in principal. I blame the uninformed community. Again, you never see the LOL people out their cutting hair. It is the public acting on their behalf.
I frankly wish there was a LOL for financially needy adults. If I or any of my friends (long haired or not) got sick and was bald, I am not sure how I could afford to buy a $3000 hairpiece. Lord knows I would be freaked out. However, I certainly do not want someone to be harrassed or tricked into cutting their hair for MY hairpiece.
Again guys......do not cut your hair for LOL. Do not let anyone badger you into cutting your hair. Make your own decisions. If YOU want to cut your hair, then that is the right reason to do so.
: I'd see the parallel if people were coming up to me saying, "you know, you've had those appliances, furniture and those clothes for a while now, why don't you just give it all to the Salvation Army and go buy all new stuff at your own expense to replace what we want you to get rid of so that this religious organization can make a profit".
: Now that is a direct parallel. Still make sense?
: The Salvation Army is a fundamentalist religious group (if you didn't already know) who is trying to make a profit to fund their religious activities. I don't agree with what they are trying to do and so I do not donate to them. Some people don't mind what they do but I'll bet that just about anyone who you ask about the Salvation Army doesn't even know that about them. Did you?
: There are many things that go into longhairs not liking L.O.L. much but despite the financial stuff the main reason is that they and all the people who respond to their emotional marketing are after our hair. We don't want to give it up and we are sick to death of people trying to get us to give it up.
: I don't think that I remember anyone saying that because they weren't making wigs out of 100% of the hair that they should stop. It's that they only use 3% (out of 100%) to make wigs with that bothers most people who learn this.
Re: research my posts carefully
Posted by Hair Religion on October 07, 2003 at 12:09:33: Previous Next
In Reply to: research your charities!! posted by Dennis on October 07, 2003 at 11:10:07:
I wasn't saying that the Salvation Army comes to you asking like that, but if the "parallel" example he gave were to be presented correctly this is what we would be hearing from random people...which doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
Re: research my posts carefully
Posted by Dennis on October 07, 2003 at 13:06:59: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: research my posts carefully posted by Hair Religion on October 07, 2003 at 12:09:33:
opps...sorry. I understand you now.
: I wasn't saying that the Salvation Army comes to you asking like that, but if the "parallel" example he gave were to be presented correctly this is what we would be hearing from random people...which doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
and another thing
Posted by Dennis on October 06, 2003 at 14:28:00: Previous Next
In Reply to: Locks of Love-long post posted by Dennis on October 06, 2003 at 05:53:31:
This Rapunzel contest thing makes me a little nuts. I just hope that all the people who have exceptionally long hair that will undoubtably be approached to cut it short will have the strength to evaluate whether they REALLY want to go through with it. There have been some folks with very, very long hair cut it and donate it. There are testimonial pages on the web supporting their own decision. I would love to see them at least link the winner of this contest with the child who gets her hair for a wig. That would be good publicity and would be cool for both the donor and recepient child.
The contest will undoubtably get more hair cut and sold (or used), more money will roll in and hopefully benefit more children. One thing that I could not find out is what is the demand for these wigs? The letter Jenn posted from the head of LOL says there is no waiting list for kids to get wigs. It does sound like they do not turn any kids down who ask for a wig (including boys, which makes me happy).
How may kids need the wigs?
If the supply 100 kids a year with a wig at $1000 a pop, that is $100,000. tha seems to fit realistically (I guess) into their numbers.
But who knows?
Anyway......DON'T CUT YOUR HAIR FOR LOCKS OF LOVE. Send them money if you feel like they are a worthy cause.
I don't think they should be shut down or anything, but they do seem to be like a runaway train the last couple of years.
Re: Locks of Love-long post
Posted by Mick on October 07, 2003 at 02:50:32: Previous Next
In Reply to: Locks of Love-long post posted by Dennis on October 06, 2003 at 05:53:31:
Something most people don't realize is that most of the families of the children must pay thousands of dollars for each hairpiece. The hairpieces are NOT free to the children.
Re: Locks of Love-long post
Posted by Dennis on October 07, 2003 at 11:10:02: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: Locks of Love-long post posted by Mick on October 07, 2003 at 02:50:32:
: Something most people don't realize is that most of the families of the children must pay thousands of dollars for each hairpiece. The hairpieces are NOT free to the children.
Locks of Love gives wigs to children who financially cannot afford to pay the thousands of dollars to buy them. They determine on a sliding scale what a child's family must pay, if anything. Sliding scales are not unusual in determining need to make sure those who cannot afford help are the ones getting it.
If a child comes from a household that has an income of $750,000 a year (I just pulled that figure out of the air; I do not know what the sliding scale is). then I bet the family has to buy the wig. A family with that kind of income probably already has medical insurance that will pay for it anyway or surely come up with $3000 for their sick child.
There is criteria that one must meet in order to get a "free" wig. They are custom made and do not just hand them out.
All of this information is on their web page.
Can donate multiple times
Posted by Pete_J on October 08, 2003 at 12:58:43: Previous Next
In Reply to: Locks of Love-long post posted by Dennis on October 06, 2003 at 05:53:31:
There was an article in the local paper about a guy who has donated his hair to LOL several times. He just grows it out again for three years, until it is long enough again. So donating doesn't necessarily mean that a longhair is being converted to a shorthair, nor that the guy has received a 'makeover'. Donate your hair if you wish, and then just start growing it out again!