Rock Stars
Posted by InUtero on September 18, 2002 at 15:28:30: Previous Next
Hey, I havn'nt posted in a while, maybe because I ain't a long hair. But I still lurk.
Anyway, hi again guys.
I was just wondering, why do rock stars have long hair, or why is long hair conisdered to by a rock star posture? Does it stem back from the hair metal days, and just another cliqued sub culture?
James
curious
It goes way, way, way back...
Posted by LucksKind on September 18, 2002 at 17:11:39: Previous Next
In Reply to: Rock Stars posted by InUtero on September 18, 2002 at 15:28:30:
way, way, way way, way, way way, way, way back....
...Elvis would have had it but it would not have looked good on HIM...
....so he didn't : )
Re: It goes way, way, way back...
Posted by Bill on September 18, 2002 at 17:54:55: Previous Next
In Reply to: It goes way, way, way back... posted by LucksKind on September 18, 2002 at 17:11:39:
: way, way, way way, way, way way, way, way back....
: ...Elvis would have had it but it would not have looked good on HIM...
Back further than that. Think "rhythm, music, flying manes, flickering firelight". Dancing around the fire is mankind's defiance to all that would attack in the night. It is mankind's ultimate assertion of power. It is an image of which long manes are very much a part. It thrills our primeval soul.
No matter the music and flickering lights are often now electric. Our psyches demand that flying manes remain a part of this powerful scene.
Stopping to think
Posted by LucksKind on September 18, 2002 at 18:50:14: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: It goes way, way, way back... posted by Bill on September 18, 2002 at 17:54:55:
: Think "rhythm, music, flying manes, flickering firelight" ~Bill
Hmmmmm...now that you mention it...makes a lot of sense...
...LONGhair has been around for a long long longlong Time!
way back to caveman times!
Posted by STALKER on September 19, 2002 at 13:58:52: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: It goes way, way, way back... posted by Bill on September 18, 2002 at 17:54:55:
: Back further than that. Think "rhythm, music, flying manes, flickering firelight". Dancing around the fire is mankind's defiance to all that would attack in the night.
And that even goes on today, with a defiance against haircut regulations!
: It is mankind's ultimate assertion of power. It is an image of which long manes are very much a part. It thrills our primeval soul.
: No matter the music and flickering lights are often now electric. Our psyches demand that flying manes remain a part of this powerful scene.
Re: Rock Stars
Posted by Hohner on September 18, 2002 at 20:16:04: Previous Next
In Reply to: Rock Stars posted by InUtero on September 18, 2002 at 15:28:30:
I just wonder why the rockstars that have long hair still like robert plant and jimmy page and ect ect dont go bald or anything like some men do. can you recall a rockstar that is still famouse that had long hair and still has great long hair . Take ozzy osborne for example. Maybe its a conspieracy (cant spell tonight)
Re: Rock Stars
Posted by SixStringThing on September 18, 2002 at 21:47:34: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: Rock Stars posted by Hohner on September 18, 2002 at 20:16:04:
: I just wonder why the rockstars that have long hair still like robert plant and jimmy page and ect ect dont go bald or anything like some men do. can you recall a rockstar that is still famouse that had long hair and still has great long hair . Take ozzy osborne for example. Maybe its a conspieracy (cant spell tonight)
it happens. kerry king from Slayer said his hair was thinning and that's why he shaved it, he would probably be going slightly bald by now anyway. theres more, they are only human
Frampton
Posted by Rokker on September 19, 2002 at 12:27:20: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: Rock Stars posted by SixStringThing on September 18, 2002 at 21:47:34:
Frampton had among the most known manes in rock history.
Not any more!
Frampton scares me...
Posted by The Rev on September 20, 2002 at 11:37:11: Previous Next
In Reply to: Frampton posted by Rokker on September 19, 2002 at 12:27:20:
The other day, I was up watching "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band." You know, that movie from the 70s where Frampton and the BeeGees sing Beatles songs.
Anyway, I was watching and this girl popped into the scene with, I have to admit, one of the nicest butts I've ever seen. Then she turned around and it was Frampton!!
Well, after about 6 scalding hot "Ajax and Steel Wool" showers, I decided to steer clear of Frampton from then on!
Scary.
The Rev
Lol
Posted by Remi on September 20, 2002 at 14:06:15: Previous Next
In Reply to: Frampton scares me... posted by The Rev on September 20, 2002 at 11:37:11:
Lol
Re: Rock Stars
Posted by Yadgar on September 20, 2002 at 14:55:07: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: Rock Stars posted by SixStringThing on September 18, 2002 at 21:47:34:
: it happens. kerry king from Slayer said his hair was thinning and that's why he shaved it, he would probably be going slightly bald by now anyway. theres more, they are only human
Or think of Ian Anderson from Jethro Tull... gorgeous mane back in the 70s, but now? At least beards usually don't thin out - except when undergoing heavy chemotherapy...
Re: Rock Stars
Posted by Loren on September 19, 2002 at 14:37:00: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: Rock Stars posted by Hohner on September 18, 2002 at 20:16:04:
How about Zakk Wylde?
Re: Rock Stars
Posted by Someone on September 19, 2002 at 06:48:00: Previous Next
In Reply to: Rock Stars posted by InUtero on September 18, 2002 at 15:28:30:
Does It really matter? I mean what the hell? I personally recon because they are trying to not conform.
Re: "Rock Stars"?
Posted by Hair Religion on September 19, 2002 at 12:05:36: Previous Next
In Reply to: Rock Stars posted by InUtero on September 18, 2002 at 15:28:30:
All I seem to see now on "rock stars" nowdays is short hair. It's a good warning sign with lots of them, "short hair=lame music". If it's "musicians" then that's a different story. Many "musicians" don't have long hair but there is a larger percentage than in the general population that do. Anything creative "tends" to lead one to a slightly different view of life and in turn social norms.
I can't speak for anyone else but my hair is a sign of committment/dedication. Think of that when seeing musicians play who are not "rock stars" and probably will never be.
Also, in a visual sense, hair lends to a larger onstage presence and usually also adds more movement to a performance.
They all use drugs too
Posted by Remi on September 19, 2002 at 18:48:24: Previous Next
In Reply to: Rock Stars posted by InUtero on September 18, 2002 at 15:28:30:
Well, they don't all use drugs, but a lot of rock stars use drugs. I don't know why.
drugs
Posted by The Rev on September 20, 2002 at 11:32:46: Previous Next
In Reply to: They all use drugs too posted by Remi on September 19, 2002 at 18:48:24:
Drugs have been a big thing (with artists primarily) for most of the century. Ernest Hemingway and the rest of the Lost Generation crowd used to drink absinthe and smoke weed (this was before Prohibition). Sigmund Freud did coke (so did Sherlock Holmes; what do you think that 7% solution was made of? Water and cocaine).
In the sixties, the use of drugs to expand the mind and enhance creativity saw a leap (Jimi Hendrix, Morrison, etc.) and that evolved into the "Rock Star Excess" era of the 70s (Aerosmith).
Now all those old guys have been through rehab (Ozzy) and the younger ones just coming on the scene are alot more conservative, I think. More weed and speed, less LSD, PCP, etc.
The Rev
Re: drugs
Posted by InUtero on September 20, 2002 at 19:56:21: Previous Next
In Reply to: drugs posted by The Rev on September 20, 2002 at 11:32:46:
: Drugs have been a big thing (with artists primarily) for most of the century. Ernest Hemingway and the rest of the Lost Generation crowd used to drink absinthe and smoke weed (this was before Prohibition). Sigmund Freud did coke (so did Sherlock Holmes; what do you think that 7% solution was made of? Water and cocaine).
: In the sixties, the use of drugs to expand the mind and enhance creativity saw a leap (Jimi Hendrix, Morrison, etc.) and that evolved into the "Rock Star Excess" era of the 70s (Aerosmith).
: Now all those old guys have been through rehab (Ozzy) and the younger ones just coming on the scene are alot more conservative, I think. More weed and speed, less LSD, PCP, etc.
: The Rev
Then for the better
Re: Rock Stars
Posted by j.s. on September 20, 2002 at 20:07:38: Previous Next
In Reply to: Rock Stars posted by InUtero on September 18, 2002 at 15:28:30:
i thought that long hair on rock stars started as an anti-establishment rebellion in the late 60's. i also believe that the look was somewhat associated with the anti-war movement (vietnam) here in the united states. (alot of the guys burning draft cards had long hair) at some point guys realized that some women liked long hair on men so the look sort of caught on.
There may be another reason...
Posted by canon_56 on September 23, 2002 at 10:25:51: Previous Next
In Reply to: Rock Stars posted by InUtero on September 18, 2002 at 15:28:30:
Long hair can also help protect your hearing.Especially thick hair. I play Guitar, so I'm exposed to loud noise a lot. It's one of the reasons I started growing my hair long. But mainly cause long hair looks so cool!
Most rock stars may not even consider the hearing thing, but it's just an interesting little fact I picked up I thought I'd share.
Re: There may be another reason...
Posted by Victor on September 23, 2002 at 12:11:51: Previous Next
In Reply to: There may be another reason... posted by canon_56 on September 23, 2002 at 10:25:51:
: Long hair can also help protect your hearing.Especially thick hair. I play Guitar, so I'm exposed to loud noise a lot. It's one of the reasons I started growing my hair long. But mainly cause long hair looks so cool!
:
: Most rock stars may not even consider the hearing thing, but it's just an interesting little fact I picked up I thought I'd share.
I question this. Consider that the wavelength of a sound at the limit of human hearing is about 0.5 cm. It will pass through hair just as readily as light passes through your cornea, and for the same reason: the spacing of the fibers is much smaller than the wavelength of the signal.
Re: There may be another reason...
Posted by Bill on September 23, 2002 at 15:33:24: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: There may be another reason... posted by Victor on September 23, 2002 at 12:11:51:
: I question this. Consider that the wavelength of a sound at the limit of human hearing is about 0.5 cm. It will pass through hair just as readily as light passes through your cornea, and for the same reason: the spacing of the fibers is much smaller than the wavelength of the signal.
I'd add that if hair over your ears impaired your hearing, nature would undoubtedly not be growing it there. :-)
Bill
Re: There may be another reason?
Posted by STALKER on September 24, 2002 at 22:45:15: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: There may be another reason... posted by Victor on September 23, 2002 at 12:11:51:
: : Long hair can also help protect your hearing.Especially thick hair. I play Guitar, so I'm exposed to loud noise a lot. It's one of the reasons I started growing my hair long. But mainly cause long hair looks so cool!
: :
: : Most rock stars may not even consider the hearing thing, but it's just an interesting little fact I picked up I thought I'd share.
I can hear just as well with long hair!
: I question this. Consider that the wavelength of a sound at the limit of human hearing is about 0.5 cm. It will pass through hair just as readily as light passes through your cornea, and for the same reason: the spacing of the fibers is much smaller than the wavelength of the signal.
Re: There may be another reason?
Posted by Webmaster on September 24, 2002 at 23:33:59: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: There may be another reason? posted by STALKER on September 24, 2002 at 22:45:15:
The message this is in reply to has been edited. Stalker, could you please let me know how you are entering those elipsis marks? It is causing weird display problems in Opera. For example, it forces a new line. I would ask you to please stop entering them that way (appears to be a single character), but I'm curious how you are doing it.
NO ISO
Posted by STALKER on September 26, 2002 at 22:36:10: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: There may be another reason? posted by Webmaster on September 24, 2002 at 23:33:59:
: The message this is in reply to has been edited. Stalker, could you please let me know how you are entering those elipsis marks? It is causing weird display problems in Opera.
Apparently, the webmaster's browser (Opera) isn't handling the ISO characters properly.
: For example, it forces a new line. I would ask you to please stop entering them that way (appears to be a single character), but I'm curious how you are doing it.
It IS a single character!
Re: There may be another WAY!
Posted by STALKER on September 26, 2002 at 22:47:50: Previous Next
In Reply to: Re: There may be another reason? posted by Webmaster on September 24, 2002 at 23:33:59:
: The message this is in reply to has been edited. Stalker, could you please let me know how you are entering those elipsis marks? It is causing weird display problems in Opera. For example, it forces a new line. I would ask you to please stop entering them that way (appears to be a single character), but I'm curious how you are doing it.
The correct way may be found here and here!