Re: A stupid question about undercuts?
Posted by Skarred Orange on February 18, 2003 at 16:42:44: Previous Next
In Reply to: A stupid question about undercuts? posted by PINK FLOYD FANATIC on February 18, 2003 at 16:11:52:
: Don't mean to be stupid but I'm still relatively new in the last month or so! OK what real is an undercut? I keep hearing how bad they look. I may have an idea but just in cast could someone either post a picture or a link to a picture with an undercut?
They're kinda like the other extreme of a mullet. Long on top, shaved on the sides and a little in the back. Sorry don't have a picture to hand of anyone right now.
Re: A stupid question about undercuts?
Posted by SleezeBob on February 18, 2003 at 16:50:22: Previous NextIn Reply to: Re: A stupid question about undercuts? posted by Skarred Orange on February 18, 2003 at 16:42:44:
Pork. The other white meat.
The Undercut. The other bad hair style.
Re: A stupid question about undercuts?
Posted by MG on February 19, 2003 at 03:36:10: Previous NextIn Reply to: Re: A stupid question about undercuts? posted by SleezeBob on February 18, 2003 at 16:50:22:
: Pork. The other white meat.
: The Undercut. The other bad hair style.
Oh how judgemental we all become.
Re: A stupid question about undercuts?
Posted by Rokker on February 19, 2003 at 08:13:25: Previous NextIn Reply to: Re: A stupid question about undercuts? posted by MG on February 19, 2003 at 03:36:10:
: Oh how judgemental we all become.
It's not judgmental. It's like the mullet. Either have long hair or don't. Long hair with buzzed sides looks silly. It just does. I'm amazed that anyone would think it looks cool. It doesn't. Guys with undercuts looks like dorks...and that goes from RASSLERS (the fake wrestling WWE chumps) to wannabe rasslers. And once it's cut, it takes YEARS for it to grow back and catch up with the rest of the hair...if it ever does.I'll try to find a pic to post.
Re: A stupid question about undercuts?
Posted by Joe on February 19, 2003 at 14:53:34: Previous NextIn Reply to: Re: A stupid question about undercuts? posted by Rokker on February 19, 2003 at 08:13:25:
this is Korn, i think they were reasponsible for the undercut craze in the early 90s. alot of dreadlocks/braids here, but the guy in the middle is a good example of long hair with an undercut. not entirely awful, but not exactly "sexy"
Korn
Posted by Rokker on February 19, 2003 at 16:52:48: Previous NextIn Reply to: Re: A stupid question about undercuts? posted by Joe on February 19, 2003 at 14:53:34:
What Korn really needs is an infusion of talent. They need that even more than they need real hair.
I've met the guys before, and they are very cool and very friendly. Nice guys. But their music isn't exactly awe inspiring by any means.
I don't like the hair of any band member in Korn.
Re: A stupid question about undercuts?
Posted by MG on February 19, 2003 at 17:13:35: Previous NextIn Reply to: Re: A stupid question about undercuts? posted by Rokker on February 19, 2003 at 08:13:25:
: : Oh how judgemental we all become.
:
: It's not judgmental. It's like the mullet. Either have long hair or don't. Long hair with buzzed sides looks silly. It just does. I'm amazed that anyone would think it looks cool. It doesn't. Guys with undercuts looks like dorks...and that goes from RASSLERS (the fake wrestling WWE chumps) to wannabe rasslers. And once it's cut, it takes YEARS for it to grow back and catch up with the rest of the hair...if it ever does.: I'll try to find a pic to post.
Oh but I think you are. If someone has an undercut and really likes
the way they look and are very happy with the way their hair hangs and
looks tied back it seems to bug you no end. There are a whole lot of
people who think long hair of any kind is stupid and dorky. It should
be so a person can have his hair any way he wants. Also undercuts
serve a purpose other than just a "style".
it must really be a burden...
Posted by stinKfoot on February 20, 2003 at 09:58:18: Previous NextIn Reply to: Re: A stupid question about undercuts? posted by Rokker on February 19, 2003 at 08:13:25:
...being so much better than everyone else. how you must suffer in superior loneliness.
Re: A stupid question about undercuts?
Posted by SixStringThing on February 18, 2003 at 17:13:19: Previous Next
In Reply to: A stupid question about undercuts? posted by PINK FLOYD FANATIC on February 18, 2003 at 16:11:52:
: Don't mean to be stupid but I'm still relatively new in the last month or so! OK what real is an undercut? I keep hearing how bad they look. I may have an idea but just in cast could someone either post a picture or a link to a picture with an undercut?
It's long on top, short on sides. But it varies, I have one that is about an inch and a half all around the bottom edge, it's not really shaved but it's pretty short. I never tie my hair back so I could get a really extreme one and nobody would notice but if you tie it back you can usually see it on most people.