Re: Undercuts?
Posted by Treyn on August 28, 2003 at 18:29:10: Previous Next
In Reply to: Undercuts? posted by Sid on August 28, 2003 at 17:40:55:
These pics are a very extreme version of an under-cut. All the hair left on top and shaved underneath:
How to see the pics.
Posted by King_Buzzo_Alike on August 28, 2003 at 19:36:02: Previous NextIn Reply to: Re: Undercuts? posted by Treyn on August 28, 2003 at 18:29:10:
Right click the red x's, head into properties, highlight the address and copy-paste it into your browser to see the pics. Can't remote link from Geocities Treyn!
Anyhow, I quite like the third pic's end result but if/when I get an undercut I wouldn't have it so severely shaved. That 'do looks like the old Phil Anselmo tie-back mohawk!
Re: Undercuts?
Posted by KiwiDan on August 31, 2003 at 10:16:18: Previous Next
In Reply to: Undercuts? posted by Sid on August 28, 2003 at 17:40:55:
: What exactly is an undercut? Is it good or bad???
well, if you are growing out your hair and your hair is real thick (like REAL think) and looks real wierd, then they can be useful. otherwise no. They were briefly in style around the early nineties but i think they look real bad. Esp in a ponytail.
Long thick hair is easily preferable to long thin stringy hair in my opinion. I used to have an undercut in the 90s and it made the hair more manageable and i guess helped it go straighter at the time, but i grew it out and now it is the same length as the rest of my hair. I think it looks a lot better even if it is curlier.
Swedish Metal Rules
KiwiDan